Correction Computation of Stopping Sight Distance in Approaching Section of Mountain Tunnel Based on Traffic Flow Theory
-
摘要: 速度是停车视距中最重要的计算参数，而现有停车视距模型的修正计算中较少考虑山岭隧道交通环境对车辆行驶速度的影响。为研究山岭隧道接近段速度流量特性，选取重庆具有代表性的4条山岭隧道开展交通观测现场实验。利用山岭隧道接近段车速和车流量数据，分析车流量和速度的时空特性分布规律与统计学关系，建立山岭隧道接近段车速和流量关系模型的函数表达式，推导基于流量与速度特性的山岭隧道接近段停车视距公式，并与相关标准和规范的取值进行比较，揭示其变化规律。结果表明，山岭隧道接近段车速呈现先减小后增加的变化规律；车流量与车辆行驶速度显著相关，经拟合得到拟合判定系数R2=0.9的速度流量模型；相同速度下，修正后停车视距计算值约为规范计算值的1.07~1.21倍；修正值与规范值的差值随车速增大而增大，修正后的停车视距长度至少可满足70%驾驶员的需求。在相应规范的基础上，考虑交通量对停车视距中速度的影响，提高山岭隧道接近段行车安全水平。Abstract: Speed is the most important calculation parameter in stopping sight distance. However, the existing correction computation of the model of stopping sight distance does not consider the impacts of traffic environment in mountain tunnel on the driving speed. Four representative mountain tunnels in Chongqing are selected to carry out field experiments, thus studying characteristics of speed flow in the approaching section of mountain tunnel. The data of speed and traffic flow in the approach section is used to analyze the distribution law and statistical relationship of traffic flow and speed. Then a model of the relationship between vehicle speed and traffic flow in the approaching section is developed to derive the stopping sight distance formula based on the characteristics of speed flow. The values of relevant standards and norms are compared to reveal the law of change. The results show that the speed of the approaching section of the mountain tunnel decreases first and then increases. Traffic flow is significantly related to vehicle speed. After fitting, a calculation model with coefficient R2 =0.9 is obtained. At the same speed, the modified value is about 1.07 to 1.21 times of the standard value. The greater the speed, the greater the differences. The modified stoppingsight distance length can meet the needs of 70% drivers at least. Based on the corresponding regulations, the impacts of traffic flow on vehicle speed of the stopping sight distance is considered to improve the driving safety level in the approaching section of the mountain tunnel.
-
图 1 隧道接近段布点示意图
Figure 1. Distribution of points in the approaching section of the tunnel
图 2 长冲隧道、南山隧道、真武山隧道、慈母山1号隧道车流量变化图
Figure 2. Variation of traffic flow in Changhong tunnel, Nanshan tunnel, Zhenwushan tunnel, and Cimushan No.1 Tunnel
图 3 长冲隧道、南山隧道、真武山隧道和慈母山1号隧道车速与隧道入口距离关系
Figure 3. Relationship between the vehicle speed and tunnel entrance distance of Changhong tunnel, Nanshan tunnel, Zhenwushan tunnel, and Cimushan No.1 Tunnel
图 4 车流量车速拟合曲线图(R2 =0.9)
Figure 4. Fitting curve of the vehicle flow and speed (R2 =0.9)
图 5 规范计算值与修正计算值对比图
Figure 5. Comparison between the standard calculation value and modified calculation value
表 1 试验隧道工况
Table 1. Conditions of mountain tunnels for field experiments
隧道名称 天气 车道数/单向 限速/（km/h） 停车视距/m 长冲隧道 阴 1 40 40 南山隧道 阴 2 60 75 慈母山1号隧道 阴 3 70 90 真武山隧道 阴 3 80 110 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 长冲隧道、南山隧道、真武山隧道、慈母山1号隧道各测点的车辆密度
Table 2. Vehicle density at each measure point of Changhong tunnel, Nanshan tunnel, Ahenwushan tunnel, and Cimushan No.1 Tunnel
测点 所测隧道的车辆密度/（pcu/h） 长冲隧道 南山隧道 真武山隧道 慈母山1号隧道 1 3.13 19.48 55.81 19.53 2 3.19 19.95 57.57 19.87 3 3.29 20.25 59.12 20.12 4 3.25 20.04 58.48 20.20 5 3.17 19.27 57.53 19.92
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 邓尼特检验
Table 3. Dunnett's test
因子I 因子J 显著性p 长冲隧道 南山隧道 < 0.05 真武山隧道 < 0.05 慈母山1号隧道 < 0.05 南山隧道 真武山隧道 < 0.05 慈母山1号隧道 > 0.05 真武山隧道 慈母山1号隧道 < 0.05
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 需求视距检验
Table 4. Demanded sight distance inspection
类别 停车视距/m 长冲隧道 向黄隧道 石黄隧道 南山隧道 10%驾驶员需求长度 42.5 40 61 71 30%驾驶员需求长度 44.5 42.5 64 75.5 70%驾驶员需求长度 49.5 45.5 70.5 81 90%驾驶员需求长度 51 55 74 83.5 规范计算长度 40 40 65 75 修正计算长度 50 52 72 88
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 交通运输部. 2019年交通运输行业发展统计公报[N]. 中国交通报, 2020-05-12(002).Ministry of Transport. Statistical bulletin of transport industry development in 2019[N]. China Communications News, 2020-05-12(002). (in Chinese) [2] 陈瑶, 邢莹莹, 陆键, 等. 基于TOBIT模型的越江隧道事故率影响因素分析[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2020, 44(2): 281-285. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTKJ202002016.htmCHEN Yao, XING Yingying, LU Jian, et al. Analysis of influencing factors on accident rate of river-crossing tunnel based on tobit model[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering), 2020, 44(2): 281-285. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTKJ202002016.htm [3] MA Zhaoyou, FANG Shouen, LIU Shuo, et al. Analysis of the relationship between the number of traffic accidents and the traffic flow & section location in extra long tunnel[J]. Engineering, 2020, 12(2): 71-81. doi: 10.4236/eng.2020.122007 [4] JIAN J L, XING Y Y, WANG C, et al. Risk factors affecting the severity of traffic accidents at shanghai river-crossing tunnel[J]. Journal of Crash Prevention and Injury Control, 2016, 17 (2): 176-180. http://smartsearch.nstl.gov.cn/paper_detail.html?id=918914cdc6b88ff1e90dceab1a74fe82 [5] 袁玲薇, 熊坚, 陈瑶, 等. 不同路面条件下山区公路景观对停车视距的影响[J]. 公路与汽运, 2017(1): 52-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2668.2017.01.013YUAN Lingwei, XIONG Jian, CHEN Yao, et al. Influence of mountain road landscape on stopping sight distance under different road conditions[J]. Highways & Automotive Applications, 2017(1): 52-56. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2668.2017.01.013 [6] HSU C J, JONES E G. Sensitivity analyses of stopping distance for connected vehicles at active highway-rail grade crossings[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2017, (99): 210-217. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27960101 [7] WARSHAWSKY-LIVEN L, SHINAR D. Effects of uncertainty, transmission type, driver age and gender on brake reaction and movement time[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2002, 33(1): 117-128. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00006-3 [8] 孙璐, 秦玉秀, 游克思, 等. 基于可靠度的隧道行车视距影响因素分析[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 44(4): 859-863. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX201404032.htmSUN Lu, QIN Yuxiu, YOU Kesi, et al. Analysis on influencing factors of tunnel driving sight distance based on reliability[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2014, 44(4): 859-863. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX201404032.htm [9] BOGDEVICIUS M, VLADIMIROY O. Efficiency of a braking process evaluating the roughness of road surface[J]. Transport, 2010, 21(1): 3-7. doi: 10.1080/16484142.2006.9638032 [10] 朱云升, 王世立, 龚娟, 等. 凝冰路面弯道路段停车视距计算方法[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2019, 19(3): 766-773. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AQHJ201903007.htmZHU Yunsheng, WANG Shili, GONG Juan, et al. Calculation method of stopping sight distance in curve section of ice road[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2019, 19(3): 766-773. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AQHJ201903007.htm [11] 王双, 吴聪, 阮雅端, 等. 降雨天气下停车视距模型与安全限速分析[J]. 电子测量技术, 2013, 36(11): 16-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZCL201311006.htmWANG Shuang, WU Cong, RUAN Yaduan, et al. Parking sight distance model and safety speed limit analysis under rainy weather[J]. Electronic Measurement Technology, 2013, 36(11): 16-20. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZCL201311006.htm [12] 吴兵, 翟犇, 卢建涛, 等. 基于安全风险的恶劣天气下高速公路建议车速确定方法[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(11): 1570-1578. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ202011005.htmWU Bing, ZHAI Ben, LU Jiantao, et al. Determination of freeway recommended speed based on safety risk under adverse weather conditions[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2020, 48(11): 1570-1578. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ202011005.htm [13] BEN-EDIGBE J E, MAKINDE O O. Influence of night rainfall on stopping sight distance on dark roadways[J]. The Open Transportation Journal, 2020(14): 32-37. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/340846968_Influence_of_Night_Rainfall_on_Stopping_Sight_Distance_on_Dark_Roadways [14] 袁浩, 史桂芳, 黄晓明, 等. 停车视距制动模型[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 39(4): 859-862. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2009.04.041YUAN Hao, SHI Guifang, HUANG Xiaoming, et al. Stopping sight distance braking model[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2009, 39(4): 859-862. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2009.04.041 [15] 杨永红, 吴传海, 葛婷, 等. 山区高速公路超车道小客车停车视距安全性[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 34 (5): 42-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201405008.htmYANG Yonghong, WU Chuanhai, GE Ting, et al. Parking sight distance safety of minibus on overtaking lane of mountain expressway[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition), 2014, 34(5): 42-48. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201405008.htm [16] 姜虹, 李峰. 不同路面条件下高速公路的停车视距建模与安全车速分析[J]. 西安工业大学学报, 2012, 32(1): 25-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGY201201007.htmJIANG Hong, LI Feng. Parking sight distance modeling and safe speed analysis of expressway under different road conditions[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Technology, 2012, 32 (1): 25-30. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGY201201007.htm [17] 王晓楠, 王云泽, 苗慕楠, 等. 动态停车视距模型研究及应用[J]. 公路, 2015(11): 151-155. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL201511035.htmWANG Xiaonan, WANG Yunze, MIAO munan, et al. Research and application of dynamic stopping sight distance model[J]. Highway, 2015(11): 151-155. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL201511035.htm [18] 刘浪, 白彬, 燕南, 等. 基于驾驶员视认性的山区双车道公路交叉口停车视距计算[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 36(5): 98-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQJT201705056.htmLIU Lang, BAI Bin, YAN Nan, et al. Calculation of stopping sight distance at mountain two lane highway intersection based on driver's visibility[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 36(5): 98-103. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQJT201705056.htm [19] 招商局重庆交通科研设计院有限公司. 中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路隧道照明设计细则: JTGT D70/2—01— 2014[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2014.China Merchants Chongqing Communications Technology Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd. Ministry of Transport, People's Republic of China. Guidelines for design of lighting of highway tunnels: JTGT D70/2—01—2014[S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2014. (in Chinese) [20] CIE. Guide for the lighting of road tunnels and underpasses: Technical report. 88-2004[R]. Vienna: CIE, 2004. -
点击查看大图
图(5) / 表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 369
- HTML全文浏览量: 234
- PDF下载量: 15
- 被引次数: 0