An Analysis of Park and Ride Choice Behavior around Rail Stations Based on Cross-Nested Logit Model
-
摘要: 研究轨道站点停车换乘选择行为，分析出行者选择停车换乘出行的影响因素，可进一步改善设施运营状况与优化设施配置。选取南京市轨道站点作为研究对象，通过采集轨道站点停车换乘设施的使用情况，从个人属性、出行属性及停车换乘意向3个方面对设施使用者的停车换乘选择行为进行调查。分析停车换乘选择行为的影响因素并选取9项特征变量，考虑出行者换乘方式、时间、距离，选择换乘便捷度和换乘次数进一步分析出行者停车换乘选择行为。分别以换乘便捷度和换乘次数为上层巢构建交叉巢式Logit模型，对比分析不同情况下出行者选择停车换乘出行的影响因素差异，揭示特征变量对站点选择和出行方式选择的影响。研究结果表明：换乘便捷度和换乘次数为CNL模型上层巢的参数结果存在差异，以换乘便捷度为CNL模型上层巢的结果中，收入、出行目的和停车时间的参数绝对值较大，分别为0.467，0.359，0.454；以换乘次数为CNL模型上层巢的结果中，绝对值较大的则是收入、出行目的和出行次数，分别为0.550，0.579，0.642，对比发现收入和出行目的对出行者选择停车换乘的影响较大。由模型中下层选择枝对上层巢的隶属度估计值可以发现，换乘便捷度适度增加或换乘次数适度减少的情形下“，停车换乘（P&R）”出行方式的选择枝隶属度最高，分别为0.399，0.464，出行者会更倾向于选择停车换乘。以换乘便捷度和换乘次数为上层巢构建的CNL模型较巢式Logit模型和多项Logit模型精度提升约10%，在不同换乘便捷度和换乘次数情况下出行者对不同影响因素具有差异化敏感程度。
-
关键词:
- 城市轨道交通 /
- 停车换乘 /
- 选择行为 /
- 交叉巢式Logit模型
Abstract: This study aims to optimize the configuration and operation of park and ride (P&R) facilities around rail stations by investigating traveler choice behavior at rail stations in Nanjing. The data on P&R facility usage was collected, and a survey focusing on three primary aspects was conducted: personal characteristics, travel characteristics, and P&R intentions. Utilizing this data, nine key variables influencing P&R choice behavior were identified. The study incorporates factors such as transfer mode, time, and distance to examine the nuances of traveler choices. Cross-nested Logit (CNL) models with transfer convenience and times as the primary nests were developed to analyze these behaviors under varying conditions. The analysis reveals that income and travel purpose significantly impact P&R choice, with the magnitude of these effects varying between models prioritizing transfer convenience versus those emphasizing transfer times. When transfer convenience is the upper nest of the CNL model, parameters for income, travel purpose, and parking duration exhibit relatively significant absolute values, namely 0.467, 0.359, and 0.454 respectively. Conversely, when transfer frequency serves as the upper nest of the CNL model, income, travel purpose, and trip frequency demonstrate relatively substantial absolute values, namely 0.550, 0.579, and 0.642 respectively. The membership probabilities within the CNL models indicate that travelers are more likely to opt for P&R when transfer convenience moderately increases or transfer frequency moderately decreases, with the highest membership degrees being 0.399 and 0.464, respectively. This suggests a preference for balanced transfer conditions. Furthermore, the CNL models demonstrate an approximately 10% improvement in prediction accuracy over nested and multiple Logit models, underscoring their efficacy in capturing travelers'sensitivities to different transfer scenarios.-
Key words:
- urban rail transit /
- park and ride /
- choice behavior /
- cross-nested Logit model
-
图 3 站点选择与出行方式组合选择的CNL模型结构示意图
Figure 3. Structure diagram of CNL for combination selection of stations and travel modes
图 4 以换乘便捷度为CNL模型上层结构示意图
Figure 4. Superstructure diagram of CNL based on transfer convenience
图 5 以换乘次数为CNL模型上层结构示意图
Figure 5. Superstructure diagram of CNL based on transfer times
表 1 南京市轨道站点P&R设施使用情况
Table 1. P&R facility usage around Nanjing rail stations
P&R设施 设施位置 停车泊位数/个 停车换乘数/(pcu/d) 步行距离/(m) 费用/(元/d) 泰冯路 3号线、S8号线 154 72 < 100 36 柳洲东路 3号线 179 171 < 100 20 经天路 2号线 780 731 100 14 金马路 2号线、4号线 72 14 170 13 马群 2号线、S6号线 653 80 100 32 竹山路 1号线 81 24 < 100 45 诚信大道 3号线 96 10 350 14 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 停车换乘选择行为影响因素
Table 2. Set of influencing factors of P&R choice behavior
类型 影响因素 个人层面 性别 年龄 职业 收入 出行层面 家庭拥有小汽车情况 出行目的 出行次数 停车时间 停车费用 换乘次数 换乘便捷度
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 出行者特征变量情况汇总表
Table 3. Summary of traveler feature variables
类型 名称 变量 含义 社会经济属性 性别 分类变量 男性，女性 年龄 连续变量 实际值 职业 分类变量 学生，公司职员，政府及事业单位员工，私营及个体劳动者，专业人士（教师、医生、律师等），服务业人员，自由职业者（作家、艺术家等），其他 月收入/（元） 分类变量 ＜3 000，3 000~＜5 000，5 000~＜10 000，10 000~＜20 000，≥20 000 小汽车拥有量 连续变量 实际值 出行属性 出行目的 分类变量 通勤（上班、上学、商务出行），休闲娱乐，探亲访友，生活必要出行（看病、买菜等），其他 出行次数/（周/次） 分类变量 ＜1，1~＜3，4~＜6，≥6 停车时间/（h） 分类变量 ＜2，2~＜4，4~＜8，8~＜12，≥12 停车费用（元/次） 分类变量 10，15，20
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 以换乘便捷度为CNL模型上层结构的参数结果表
Table 4. Parameter results of the upper structure of CNL model with transfer convenience
特征变量 参数 数值 t检验 常数项 βi －0.079 8 3.43 性别变量 β1 －0.15 －1.49 年龄变量 β2 0.267 2.59 职业变量 β3 －0.283 －1.86 收入变量 β4 0.467 15.4 小汽车拥有量变量 β5 －0.16 1.92 出行目的变量 β6 0.359 －11.07 出行次数变量 β7 0.288 2.74 停车时间变量 β8 －0.454 15.25 停车费用变量 β9 －0.027 9 －4.47 样本数 N 917 拟合优度 ρ2 0.362
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 以换乘便捷度为巢的隶属度估计值表
Table 5. Membership degree estimation with transfer convenience as nest
隶属度 估计值 t检验 α1A 0.247 －3.18 α2A 0.242 －6.14 α3A 0.399 －4.85 α1B 0.445 －13.62 α2B 0.328 －11.53 α3B 0.346 －14.29 α1C 0.307 －8.76 α2C 0.429 －12.37 α3C 0.253 －9.31
下载: 导出CSV
表 6 以换乘次数为CNL模型上层结构的参数结果表
Table 6. Parameter results of the upper structure of CNL model with transfer times
特征变量 参数 数值 t检验 常数项 βi －0.090 6 4.59 性别变量 βi －0.134 －1.47 年龄变量 β1 0.215 3.62 职业变量 β2 －0.177 －1.73 收入变量 β3 0.55 －13.24 小汽车拥有量变量 β4 －0.119 1.27 出行目的变量 β5 0.579 －14.81 出行次数变量 β6 0.642 －10.38 停车时间变量 β7 －0.182 9.17 停车费用变量 β8 －0.046 9 －4.32 样本数 N 917 拟合优度 ρ2 0.337
下载: 导出CSV
表 7 以换乘次数为巢的隶属度估计值表
Table 7. Membership degree estimation with transfer times as nest
隶属度 估计值 t检验 α1D 0.263 －5.95 α2D 0.335 －14.3 α3D 0.464 －9.82 α1E 0.4 －11.73 α2E 0.278 4.52 α3E 0.294 8.74 α1F 0.336 －12.46 α2F 0.385 －7.91 α3F 0.241 6.48
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 中共中央国务院. 交通强国建设纲要[EB/OL]. (2019-09-19)[2023-04-10]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-09/19/content_5431432.htm .The State Council. Outline of building a strong country in transportation[EB/OL]. (2019-09-19)[2023-04-10].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-09/19/content_5431432.htm . (in Chinese)[2] 姚恩建, 邹萌, 杨扬, 等. 基于出行行为分析的停车换乘设施定价优化[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(5): 1277-1283. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTLL201805017.htmYAO E J, ZOU M, YANG Y, et al. Park and ride pricing optimization strategy on the basis of travel behavior analysis[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(5): 1277-1283. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTLL201805017.htm [3] 陈佩虹, 史明鑫. 北京市停车换乘行为影响因素分析[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 18(1): 38-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BFJD201901005.htmCHEN P H, SHI M X. Analysis on the impact factors of park-and-ride behaviors in Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 18 (1): 38-47. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BFJD201901005.htm [4] 赵芳, 四兵锋, 汪勤政, 等. 考虑多目标的城市停车换乘选址优化模型及算法[J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(10): 268-279. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2022.10.023ZHAO F, SI B F, WANG Q Z, et al. Model and algorithm for urban park-and-ride locations considering multiple objectives[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(10): 268-279. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2022.10.023 [5] ZHAO X W, CHEN P, JIAO J F, et al. How does'park and ride'perform? An evaluation using longitudinal data[J]. Transport Policy, 2019, 2019(74): 15-23. [6] KIMPTON A, POJANI D, SIPE N, et al. Parking behavior: park'n'ride (PnR) to encourage multimodalism in Brisbane[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 91: 104304. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104304 [7] WEBB A, KHANI A. Park-and-ride choice behavior in a multimodal network with overlapping routes[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020(3): 150-160. [8] YALINIZ P, USTUN O, BILGIC S, et al. Evaluation of park-and-ride application with AHP and ANP methods for the city of Eskisehir, Turkey[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2022, 148(1): 04021066. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000781 [9] HENRY E, FURNO A, EL-FAOUZI N E, et al. Locating park-and-ride facilities for resilient on-demand urbanmobility[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2022, 158: 102557. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102557 [10] MESA J A, ORTEGA F A, POZO M A, et al. Assessing the effectiveness of park-and-ride facilities on multimodal networks in smart cities[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2022, 73(3): 576-86. doi: 10.1080/01605682.2020.1854628 [11] WANG X C, HE Q. Optimal capacity sizing of park-and-ride lots with information-aware commuters[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2023, 32(11): 3614-3633. doi: 10.1111/poms.14053 [12] 孙亦凡, 干宏程. 多交通方式实时信息影响下的通勤者出行行为[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2018, 40(6): 595-600. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDGY201806013.htmSUN Y F, GAN H C. Car commuters'travel behaviors with presence of multi-modal travel information[J]. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2018, 40(6): 595-600. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDGY201806013.htm [13] 赵顺晶, 龙建成, 丁建勋, 等. 两种经营模式下通勤廊道停车换乘选址及停车费用优化[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(3): 734-742. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTLL201803020.htmZHAO S J, LONG J C, DING J X, et al. Optimal location and parking fee of park and ride facilities in a commute corridor under two operating modes[J]. Systems Engineering-The-ory & Practice, 2018, 38(3): 734-742. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTLL201803020.htm [14] 孙振东, 张生瑞, 李运, 等. 停车换乘与路票交易组合措施下居民出行特性建模分析[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 38(3): 88-96, 106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201803012.htmSUN Z D, ZHANG S R, LI Y, et al. Analysis of characteristics under combination of TCS and P&R[J]. Journal of Chang'an University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 38(3): 88-96, 106. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201803012.htm [15] 关宏志, 刘瑞远, 曾敏耀. 考虑停车换乘停车位不足的停车换乘行为[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2019, 45(6): 593-600. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJGD201906009.htmGUAN H Z, LIU R Y, ZENG M Y. Park-and-ride transfer behaviors under the circumstances of insufficient park-and-ride parking space[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technolo-gy, 2019, 45(6): 593-600. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJGD201906009.htm [16] 于晓飞, 刘兵, 陈汐, 等. 基于互联网出行数据的停车设施选址规划方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41(3): 119-127. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.03.013YU X F, LIU B, CHENG X, et al. A method for planning of parking-facility locations using internet mobility data[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(3): 119-127. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.03.013 [17] PANG H, KHANI A. Modeling park-and-ride location choice of heterogeneous commuters[J]. Transportation, 2018, 45(1): 71-87. [18] SHARMA B, HICKMAN M, NASSIR N. Park-and-ride lot choice model using random utility maximization and random regret minimization[J]. Transportation, 2019, 46(1): 217-232. [19] WANG J, WANG H, ZHANG X M. A hybrid management scheme with parking pricing and parking permit for a many-to-one park and ride network[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 112: 153-79. [20] HUANG Y, GAN H C, LU H, et al. Park-and-ride choice behaviour under multimodal travel information-Analysis based on panel mixed Logit model[J]. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2023, 17(10): 2063-2074. [21] MEI Z Y, WEI D Q, DING W C, et al. Multi-agent simulation for multi-mode travel policy to improve park and ride efficiency[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2023, 185: 109660. [22] 许胜博, 朱志国. 基于换乘次数的城市轨道交通有效径路集生成算法研究[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2017, 15 (2): 83-90, 99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTGC201702013.htmXU S B, ZHU Z G. Study on effective path set generating algorithm for urban rail transit based on transfer times[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2017, 15(2): 83-90, 99. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTGC201702013.htm -
点击查看大图
图(5) / 表(7)
计量
- 文章访问数: 266
- HTML全文浏览量: 169
- PDF下载量: 11
- 被引次数: 0