Volume 40 Issue 2
Apr.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YAO Ronghan, LONG Meng, ZHANG Wensong, QI Wenyan. User Preferences for Shared Autonomous Vehicles Based on Latent-Class Logit Models[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2022, 40(2): 135-144. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2022.02.016
Citation: YAO Ronghan, LONG Meng, ZHANG Wensong, QI Wenyan. User Preferences for Shared Autonomous Vehicles Based on Latent-Class Logit Models[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2022, 40(2): 135-144. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2022.02.016

User Preferences for Shared Autonomous Vehicles Based on Latent-Class Logit Models

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2022.02.016
  • Received Date: 2021-11-10
    Available Online: 2022-05-18
  • Shared autonomous vehicles (SAV), which integrates autonomous driving and shared economy technology, provide people with high-quality travel services. Socio-economic attributes, historical travel characteristics, and behavioral attitude characteristics of the respondents are studied, and a questionnaire of stated preferences for travel mode choice is designed by an orthogonal experiment, then 311 valid data are collected to study their behavior characteristics for choosing SAV. A latent class analysis is carried out to fully consider individual heterogeneity and to explore latent classes of users. Integrating the latent classes as the variables into discrete choice Logit models, latent class-Logit models are formulated to study user's preference for SAV. By combining a multinomial or mixed Logit model with the three latent classes discovered, the significant influencing factors for SAV user preferences are recognized out of 59 variables, including gender, travel mode, SAV user group category, waiting time, etc., calibrated by four reasonable models. Moreover, seven indices of goodness of fit are measured to evaluate the effectiveness of eight models such as multinomial Logit, mixed Logit, and latent class-Logit. The marginal utility analysis is used to investigate the impacts of the attributes of travel mode on SAV preferences. Study results show that the discrete choice Logit models with three latent classes have a higher capacity for explaining the relationship between dependent and independent variables. The three classes can be described as the impulsive and positive innovator, contradictory and conservative innovator, and rational and conservative user respectively. It is also found that the significant influencing factors obviously vary across different latent class groups; the category of SAV users group is a significant factor for all latent class groups, and the significance level of SAV innovators in each model is less than 0.1;the accuracies of the first and second categories predicted by the latent class-Logit model are 5.9%~28.3% and 5.4%~18.5% higher than those predicted by other Logit models respectively.It is also found that waiting time has the greatest impact on travelers' choice of SAV; and when the probability of choosing SAV is close to 0.5, slightly reducing the travel cost of SAV is most effective to attract travelers to use SAV, rather than private cars for travel.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    李克强, 戴一凡, 李升波, 等. 智能网联汽车(ICV)技术的发展现状及趋势[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2017, 8(1): 1-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2017.01.001

    LI K Q, DAI Y F, LI S B, et al. State-of-the-art and technical trends of intelligent and connected vehicles[J]. Journal of Au-tomotive Safety and Energy, 2017, 8(1): 1-14. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2017.01.001
    [2]
    KRUEGER R, RASHIDI T H, ROSE M J. Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2016(69): 343-355.
    [3]
    FAGNANT D J, KOCKELMAN K M. The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2014(40): 1-13.
    [4]
    LANG N S, RUESSMANN M, COLLIE B E, et al. Reshaping urban mobility with autonomous vehicles: Lessons from the city of Boston[R]. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2018.
    [5]
    SALAZAR M, ROSSI F, SCHIFFER M, et al. On the interaction between autonomous mobility-on-demand and public transportation systems[C]. 2018 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference(ITSC), Maui, Hawaii, USA, 2018.
    [6]
    CHILDRESS S, NICHOLS B, COE S. Using an activity-based model to explore possible impacts of automated vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2015(2493), 99-106.
    [7]
    ZHANG W, GUHATHAKURTA S, FANG J, et al. Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: An agent-based simulation approach[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2015(19): 34-45.
    [8]
    WEBB J, WILSON C, KULARATNE T. Will people accept shared autonomous electric vehicles? A survey before and after receipt of the costs and benefits[J]. Economic Analysis Policy, 2019(61): 118-135.
    [9]
    NAZARI F, NORUZOLIAEE M, MOHAMMADIAN A. Shared versus private mobility: Modeling public interest in autonomous vehicles accounting for latent attitudes[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018(97): 456-477.
    [10]
    姚荣涵, 梁亚林, 刘锴, 等. 考虑合乘的共享自动驾驶汽车选择行为实证分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20 (1): 228-233. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT202001035.htm

    YAO R H, LIANG Y L, LIU K, et al. Empirical analysis of choice behavior for shared autonomous vehicles with concern of ride-sharing[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(1): 228-233. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT202001035.htm
    [11]
    WANG K L, AKAR G. Factors affecting the adoption of autonomous vehicles for commute trips: An analysis with the 2015 and 2017 Puget Sound travel surveys[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2019, 2673(2): 13-25. doi: 10.1177/0361198118822293
    [12]
    PHILIPSEN R, BRELL T, ZIEFLE M. Carriage without a driver: User requirements for intelligent autonomous mobility services[C]. AHFE 2018 International Conference on Hu- man Factors in Transportation, Orlando, Florida, USA: AHFE, 2019.
    [13]
    EL ZARWI F, VIJ A, WALKER J L. A discrete choice framework for modeling and forecasting the adoption and diffusion of new transportation[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2017(79): 207-223.
    [14]
    李继朴, 贺宜, 孙昌鑫, 等. 基于SEM的自动驾驶汽车接受度模型与风险分析[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2021, 39(1): 26-34. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2021.01.0004

    LI J P, HE Y, SUN C X, et al. An acceptance model and risk analysis of automated vehicles based on SEM[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2021, 39(1): 26-34. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2021.01.0004
    [15]
    刘志伟, 刘建荣, 邓卫. 考虑潜在类别的市内机动化出行行为模型[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2021, 56(1): 131-137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT202101017.htm

    LIU Z W, LIU J R, DENG W. Motorized travel in the city analysis considering the latent classes[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(1): 131-137. (in Chi-nese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT202101017.htm
    [16]
    邱皓政. 潜在类别模型的原理与技术[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2008.

    QIU H Z. Latent class modeling: Principles and tech- niques[M]. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House, 2008.
    [17]
    CLOGG C C. Some latent structure models for the analysis of Likert-type data[J]. Social Science Research, 1979, 8(4): 287-301. doi: 10.1016/S0049-089X(79)80001-0
    [18]
    乔珂, 赵鹏, 文佳星. 基于潜在类别模型的高铁旅客市场细分[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(2): 28-34.

    QIAO K, ZHAO P, WEN J X. Passenger market segmentation of high-speed railway based on latent class model[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(2): 28-34. (in Chinese)
    [19]
    关宏志. 非集计模型: 交通行为分析的工具[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2004.

    GUAN H Z. Disaggregate model-tool for traffic behavior analysis[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2004.
    [20]
    BEN-AKIVA M, LERMAN S R. Discrete choice analysis[M]. London: The MIT Press, 1997.
    [21]
    唐立, 邹彤, 罗霞, 等. 基于混合Logit模型的网约车选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(1): 108-114.

    TANG L, ZOU T, LUO X, et al. Choice behavior of taxi-hail-ing based on Mixed-Logit model[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(1): 108-114. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(8)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (993) PDF downloads(72) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return