Volume 41 Issue 1
Feb.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHAO Xiaonan, XIE Xinlian, ZHAO Ruijia. A Method for Predicting Carbon Emission of Railway Transportation System Based on an LSTM Network with Dynamic Input via Sliding Window[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(1): 169-178. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.01.018
Citation: ZHAO Xiaonan, XIE Xinlian, ZHAO Ruijia. A Method for Predicting Carbon Emission of Railway Transportation System Based on an LSTM Network with Dynamic Input via Sliding Window[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(1): 169-178. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.01.018

A Method for Predicting Carbon Emission of Railway Transportation System Based on an LSTM Network with Dynamic Input via Sliding Window

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.01.018
  • Received Date: 2022-04-26
    Available Online: 2023-05-13
  • Low-carbon development of railway is significant for the entire transportation system to achieve the goals of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. Currently, there are a few studies on the methods for predicting carbon emission of railway transportation system, and their prediction accuracy is, in general, low. To improve the accuracy of corresponding prediction methods, considering the relationship between the historical and present information in the carbon emission time series data, a sliding window algorithm is integrated into a long short-term memory (LSTM) network to develop a prediction model for railway transportation system. A Grey Relation Analysis method is used to select the key factors with a higher correlation. The data highly correlated with the key factors identified are used as the input variables of the prediction model to improve the accuracy of the LSTM network. In addition, it is found that, by integrating a sliding window, the input of the network has been significantly improved. To study the impacts of future emission reduction policies on carbon emissions of railway transportation, the prediction model is used to analyze various policies under different scenarios. A polynomial error fitting method is used for error correction to improve the model accuracy. The data on carbon emissions from railway transportation from 1980 to 2019 are taken as the case study. Six key factors are identified and then selected from seventeen influencing factors of railway carbon emission that are reported in the literature, by using a Grey Relation Analysis. Then selected data is segmented into subsequences by the sliding window. The prediction accuracy under different window lengths is compared to select the optimal window parameters for the improved LSTM model. The improved LSTM model obtained is then compared with the original LSTM, BPNN, and RNN models. Study results show that the improved LSTM model reduces the average relative error to 0.392%, while that of the original LSTM model is 3.862%, the BPNN model 1.535%, and the RNN model 0.760%. Compared to these traditional models, the improved LSTM model consistently presents a higher accuracy. According to historical trends and development policies, a baseline scenario and three future emission reduction scenarios are set. The improved LSTM model is used to predict the carbon emissions of railway transportation in the next decade. Under the four scenarios, the carbon emissions of railway transportation in 2030 is 9.83×106 t, 8.91×106 t, 8.62×106 t, and 8.09×106 t, respectively. In summary, the improved LSTM model with sliding window can further improve the prediction accuracy of carbon emissions for railway transportation, and the scenario analysis based on various policy assumptions can provide a feasible path for future low-carbon development of railway transportation.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    曾静静. 中美气候变化联合声明为国际应对气候变化行动注入新活力[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(12): 13-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201412003.htm

    ZENG J J. China US joint statement on climate change injects new vitality into international action against climate change[J]. Progress in Geosciences, 2014, 29(12): 13-24. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201412003.htm
    [2]
    王文琳. 中国省域交通运输碳排放强度的影响因素及空间收敛性研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2019.

    WANG W L. Study on influencing factors and spatial convergence of carbon emission intensity of provincial transportation in China[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    LIN B L, LIU C, WANG H J, et al. Modeling the railway network design problem: A novel approach to considering carbon emissions reduction[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017, 56(10): 95-109.
    [4]
    GONZALEZ P F, LANDAJO M, PRESNO M J. Tracking European Union CO2 emissions through LMDI (logarithmic-mean Divisia index)decomposition. The activity revaluation approach[J]. Energy, 2014, 73(8): 741-750.
    [5]
    王勇, 韩舒婉, 李嘉源, 等. 五大交通运输方式碳达峰的经验分解与情景预测: 以东北三省为例[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41 (10): 1824-1836. doi: 10.18402/resci.2019.10.06

    WANG Y, HAN S W, LI J Y, et al. Empirical decomposition and scenario prediction of carbon peak of five transportation modes: Taking the three northeastern provinces as an example[J]. Resource Science, 2019, 41(10): 1824-1836. (in Chinese) doi: 10.18402/resci.2019.10.06
    [6]
    张宏钧, 王利宁, 陈文颖. 公路与铁路交通碳排放影响因素[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 57(4): 443-448. doi: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.25.019

    ZHANG H J, WANG L N, CHEN W Y. Influencing factors of carbon emissions of highway and railway transportation[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 57(4): 443-448. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.25.019
    [7]
    LV Q, LIU H, YANG D, et al. Effects of urbanization on freight transport carbon emissions in China: Common characteristics and regional disparity[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 211: 481-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.182
    [8]
    汪莹, 高佳钰, 雷雨轩. 我国铁路运营碳排放影响因素研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2020, 42(4): 7-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2020.04.002

    WANG Y, GAO J Y, LEI Y X. Research on the influencing factors of carbon emissions from railway operation in China[J]. Journal of Railway Society, 2020, 42(4): 7-16. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2020.04.002
    [9]
    左大杰, 戴文涛. 基于通径分析的四川省交通碳排放驱动机理研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(2): 230-235. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT201802034.htm

    ZUO D J, DAI W T. Research on the driving mechanism of transportation carbon emissions in Sichuan province based on path analysis[J]. Transportation System Engineering and Information, 2018, 18(2): 230-235. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT201802034.htm
    [10]
    王靖添, 马晓明. 中国交通运输碳排放影响因素研究——基于双层次计量模型分析[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 57(6): 1133-1142. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJDZ202106015.htm

    WANG J T, MA X M. Research on the influencing factors of carbon emissions in china's transportation——based on two-level econometric model analysis[J]. Journal of Peking University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 57(6): 1133-1142. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJDZ202106015.htm
    [11]
    卞利花, 吉敏全. 青海交通碳排放影响因素及预测研究[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(2): 35-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STJJ201902009.htm

    BIAN L H, JI M Q. Research on influencing factors and predictions of carbon emissions from transportation in Qinghai[J]. Ecological Economy, 2019, 35(2): 35-39. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STJJ201902009.htm
    [12]
    洪竞科, 李沅潮, 蔡伟光. 多情景视角下的中国碳达峰路径模拟: 基于RICE-LEAP模型[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43 (4): 639-651.

    HONG J K, LI Y C, CAI W G. Simulation of china's carbon peaking path from a multi-scenario perspective: based on rice-leap model[J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(4): 639-651. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    赵金元, 马振, 唐海亮. BP神经网络和多元线性回归模型对碳排放预测的比较[J]. 科技和产业, 2020, 20(11): 172-176. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CYYK202011028.htm

    ZHAO J Y, MA Z, TANG H L. Comparison of carbon emission prediction by BP neural network and multiple linear regression model[J]. Science and Technology and Industry, 2020, 20(11): 172-176. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CYYK202011028.htm
    [14]
    CHEN Z, LIU L, LI C. Prediction and control of carbon emissions of electric vehicles based on BP neural network under carbon neutral background[C]. 2021 International Conference on Neural Networks, Information and Communication Engineering, Qingdao: SPIE, 2021.
    [15]
    栾紫清. 基于灰色关联与预测模型分析陕西省交通运输碳排放[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2019, (3): 121-122.

    LUAN Z Q. Analysis of carbon emissions of transportation in Shaanxi province based on grey correlation and prediction model[J]. Practical Technologies for Automobiles, 2019, (3): 121-122. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    DONG G Z, WEI X Y, XIA Z D, et al. Safety risk assessment of a Pb-zn mine based on fuzzy-grey correlation analysis[J]. Electronics, 2020, 9(1): 130-148.
    [17]
    王永哲, 马立平. 吉林省能源消费碳排放相关影响因素分析及预测: 基于灰色关联分析和GM(1, 1)模型[J]. 生态经济, 2016, 32(11): 65-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STJJ201611013.htm

    WANG Y Z, MA L P. Analysis and prediction of relevant influencing factors of carbon emission from energy consumption in Jilin Province: Based on grey correlation analysis and GM(1, 1) model[J]. Ecological Economy, 2016, 32 (11): 65-70. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STJJ201611013.htm
    [18]
    GAO M, SHI G, LI S. Online prediction of ship behavior with automatic identification system sensor data using bidirectional long short-term memory recurrent neural network[J]. Sensors, 2018, 18(12): 4211-4211.
    [19]
    CHEN C L, YIN X P. Analysis of decoupling the link between transport and carbon emissions-Case of railway transport in China[C]. International Conference on Electronics, Ningbo: IEEE, 2011.
    [20]
    安实, 王雷, 周超. 基于神经网络及关联性修正的交通异常预测研究[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2019, 217(2): 10-17. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2019.02.002

    AN S, WANG L, ZHOU C. Research on traffic anomaly prediction based on neural network and correlation correction[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2019, 217(2): 10-17. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2019.02.002
    [21]
    王余宽, 谢新连, 马昊, 等. 基于滑动窗口LSTM网络的船舶航迹预测[J]. 上海海事大学学报, 2022, 43(1): 14-22.

    WANG Y K, XIE X L, MA H, et al. Ship trajectory prediction based on sliding window LSTM network[J]. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 2022, 43(1): 14-22. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (673) PDF downloads(62) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return