Volume 42 Issue 3
Jun.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Di, TAO Jiale, WAN Chengpeng. Vulnerability Assessment and Recovery Strategies for Container Shipping Networks from a Resilience Perspective[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(3): 114-121. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.012
Citation: ZHANG Di, TAO Jiale, WAN Chengpeng. Vulnerability Assessment and Recovery Strategies for Container Shipping Networks from a Resilience Perspective[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(3): 114-121. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.012

Vulnerability Assessment and Recovery Strategies for Container Shipping Networks from a Resilience Perspective

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.012
  • Received Date: 2023-11-30
    Available Online: 2024-10-21
  • The existing vulnerability evaluation of shipping networks and recovery strategies are suffering from two limitations. One is using a single assessment method, simplifying the complexity of the shipping network; the other is neglecting actual operational capabilities and spatial distance in recovery strategies, resulting in poor effectiveness in emergencies. To fill the gaps, a comprehensive evaluation of the vulnerability of the shipping network is proposed, considering the topology of the network and its actual operational capacity; multi-dimensional vulnerability evaluation indices are found based on the coefficient of variation method; recovery strategy is designed based on the backup-port rank that incorporates the spatial distance, the capacity of ports, and the number of berths. Several innovations to the model and algorithm are introduced, including a dynamic evaluation framework, adaptive weights for vulnerability indicators, and optimizations for backup port selection and traffic diversion in emergencies. To validate the proposed method, container shipping networks of China-Europe, China-Mediterranean, China-US (East Coast), and China-US (West Coast) in 2020 are introduced, topology maps of these networks are developed, and the vulnerability and dynamic capacity of these networks are analyzed. The findings show that the resilience of the shipping network is improved by 11.6% when a single port backup recovery strategy is implemented, and by 31.5% when a dual port backup recovery strategy is adopted. In summary, the proposed vulnerability assessment method and the recovery strategy based on backup-port ranking provide a novel way to improve the resilience of the shipping networks, highlighting the importance of vulnerability assessment and backup recovery strategies in shipping networks.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    WAN C, TAO J, YANG Z, et al. Evaluating recovery strategies for the disruptions in liner shipping networks: a resilience approach[J]. International Journal of Logistics Management, 2022, 33(2): 389-409.
    [2]
    POO M C-P, YANG Z. Optimising the resilience of shipping networks to climate vulnerability[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2022, 51(1): 15-34.
    [3]
    张欣, 李双菲, 孙代源. 中欧集装箱海铁复合运输网络脆弱性分析[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41(3): 48-58.

    ZHANG X, LI S F, SUN D Y. Vulnerability analysis of China-Europe container sea-rail intermodal transport network[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(3): 48-58. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    TOVAR B, HERNáNDEZ R, RODRíGUEZ-DéNIZ H. Container port competitiveness and connectivity: the canary islands main ports case[J]. Transport Policy, 2015, 38: 40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.11.001
    [5]
    徐梦俏. 基于"区域—港口—货流"的世界集装箱海运网络复杂性相关研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2017.

    XU M Q. Complexity in the global container shipping network: regions, ports, and flows[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2017. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    王列辉, 叶斐, 郑渊博. 中美集装箱航运网络格局演化与脆弱性评估[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(5): 136-144.

    WANG L H, YE F, ZHENG Y B. The assessment of Sino-US container shipping network evolution and vulnerability[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(5): 136-144. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    吴迪, 王诺, 吴暖, 等. 主航道中断背景下集装箱海运网络的脆弱性及其对中国的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(4): 719-730.

    WU D, WANG N, WU N, et al. The impact of main channel interruption on vulnerability of container shipping network and China container shipping[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(4): 719-730. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    JIANG L P, WANG G S, FENG X J, et al. Study on cascading failure vulnerability of the 21st-century maritime silk road container shipping network[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2024, 117: 103891. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103891
    [9]
    WU D, WANG N, YU A. Vulnerability analysis of global container shipping liner network based on main channel disruption[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2019, 46(4): 394-409.
    [10]
    WU Z, CHENG S, XU K, et al. Ecological network resilience evaluation and ecological strategic space identification based on complex network theory: a case study of Nanjing city[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 158: 111604. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111604
    [11]
    KOU L B, ZHAO H P. Regional resilience assessment based on city network risk propagation and cooperative recovery[J]. Cities, 2024, 147: 104856. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2024.104856
    [12]
    GOKALP C, PATIL P N, BOYLES S D. Post-disaster recovery sequencing strategy for road networks[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2021, 153: 228-245. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2021.09.007
    [13]
    王哲, 李建华, 康东, 等. 复杂网络鲁棒性增强策略研究综述[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2020, 17(3): 1-26, 46.

    WANG Z, LI J H, KANG D, et al. Review on strategies enhancing the robustness of complex network[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2020, 17(3): 1-26, 46. (in Chinese)
    [14]
    LI S H, TANG L, LIU J G, et al. Vessel schedule recovery strategy in liner shipping considering expected disruption[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2023, 237: 106514.
    [15]
    ASGHARI M, JABER M Y, MIRZAPOUR AL-E-HASHEM, S M J. Coordinating vessel recovery actions: analysis of disruption management in a liner shipping service[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2023, 307: 627-644.
    [16]
    TIAN L, DI Z R, YAO H. Effect of distribution of weight on the efficiency of weighted networks[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(2): 028901.
    [17]
    STERGIOPOULOS G, VALVIS E, MITRODIMAS D, et al. Analyzing congestion interdependencies of ports and container ship routes in the maritime network infrastructure[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 63823-63832.
    [18]
    GADE K. A non-singular horizontal position representation[J]. Journal of Navigation, 2010, 63(3): 395-417.
    [19]
    ELKAFAS A G, RIVAROLO M, MASSARDO A F. Environmental economic analysis of speed reduction measure onboard container ships[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(21): 59645-59659.
    [20]
    ZHEN Z. Competitiveness model of Chinese port manufacturing industry based on global value chain[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2020, 103: 701-704.
    [21]
    CARRESE S, PETRELLI M, RENNA A. A new approach for the identification of strategic Italian ports for container traffic[J]. Transport Policy, 2022, 120: 47-55.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (102) PDF downloads(6) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return