Volume 42 Issue 3
Jun.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Journal of Transport Information and Safety  > 2024  >  42(3): 139-147
WU Xiumei, SHI Zhan, YUAN Xiang, CAI Wenjuan. An Evaluation Method of Safety Resilience for Highway Bridge Engineering Based on an Entropy Weight and Improved TOPSIS Model[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(3): 139-147. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.015
Citation: WU Xiumei, SHI Zhan, YUAN Xiang, CAI Wenjuan. An Evaluation Method of Safety Resilience for Highway Bridge Engineering Based on an Entropy Weight and Improved TOPSIS Model[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(3): 139-147. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.015
shu

An Evaluation Method of Safety Resilience for Highway Bridge Engineering Based on an Entropy Weight and Improved TOPSIS Model

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.015
  • 1.

    School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

  • 2.

    Ningbo High-grade Highway Construction Management Center, Ningbo 315192, Zhejiang, China

  • Received Date: 2023-12-28
    Available Online: 2024-10-21
    Abstract
  • Targeting to the safety risks in freeway bridge construction caused by inadequate safety management, this paper develops a safety resilience evaluation method for bridge construction considering the full lifecycle of risk-hazard-accident. Based on bibliometric analysis and WBS theory, the concept of resilience is integrated into safety evaluation for traffic engineering. An evaluation system for freeway bridge engineering based on safety resilience theory is proposed, where the safety resilience mechanism of freeway bridge construction is investigated and evaluation index system with"4R"characteristics as primary indicators are developed. Given that traditional technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) evaluation does not account for the impact of outliers, statistical methods are used to screen and resample the outliers. Meanwhile, entropy weight method is adopted to optimize the weights of indices. By doing so, an entropy weight-improved TOPSIS model is developed for safety resilience evaluation of bridge engineering. Four freeway sections containing bridge construction are selected and their levels of safety resilience are evaluated using the proposed model, whose feasibility is analyzed as well. Results show Sections B and D have a medium level of safety resilience, while Sections A and C have a low level. Comparing to the results from the traditional risk assessment method that Sections B and D are Level Ⅰ and Sections A and C are Level Ⅱ, results from the proposed model align with real situations. Therefore, the validity and feasibility of the model are confirmed. To sum up, the proposed entropy weight-improved TOPSIS model enables sensitivity analysis and risk factor tracing, and further contributes to targeted preemptive improvements for decision-makers.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(23)
  • [1]
    安朗. 基于MCMC-CCRAA的大跨径斜拉桥施工风险预警模型[J]. 公路交通科技, 2017, 34(10): 42-50.

    AN L. A construction risk early warning model of long-span cable-stayed bridge based on MCMC-CCRAA[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 34(10): 42-50. (in Chinese)
    [2]
    王小飞. 大跨径公路斜拉桥施工安全风险预警系统研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2014.

    WANG X F. Study on construction safety risk early-warning system of long-span cable-stayed bridge[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2014. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    郑祖恩, 李志勇, 吴欣. 基于模糊综合评判法的预应力混凝土连续梁桥悬臂浇筑施工风险评估[J]. 公路工程, 2013, 38 (2): 60-64.

    ZHENG Z E, LI Z Y, WU X. Cantilever irrigating construction risk assessment of prestressed concrete continuous beam bridge based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Highway Engineering, 2013, 38(2): 60-64. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    陈国华, 吴武生, 徐三元, 等. 基于WBS-RBS与AHP的跨海桥梁工程施工HSE风险评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(9): 51-57.

    CHEN G H, WU W S, XU S Y, et al. Assessment HSE risk of during sea-crossing bridges project construction based on WBS-RBS and AHP[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(9): 51-57. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    王莉娜. 济南黄河大桥工程风险管理方法研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2009.

    WANG L N. Study on the engineering risk management method of Jinan Yellow River cable staved bridge[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2009. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    HASHEMI H, MOUSAVI S M, MOJTAHEDI S M H. Bootstrap technique for risk analysis with interval numbers in bridge construction projects[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2011, 137(8): 600-608. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000344
    [7]
    刘沐宇, 金开明. 大跨径悬索桥施工风险评估的集对分析方法[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2017, 34(5): 1-7, 14.

    LIU M Y, JIN K M. Set pair analysis for construction risk assessment of long span suspension bridge[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2017, 34(5): 1-7, 14. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    李思源. 建筑工程施工安全韧性的影响机理及其演化机制研究[D]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2024.

    LI S Y. Research on the influencing mechanism and evolution mechanism of construction safety resilience of construction engineering[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University, 2024. (in Chinese)
    [9]
    张欣, 李双菲, 孙代源. 中欧集装箱海铁复合运输网络脆弱性分析[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41(3): 48-58. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.03.006

    ZHANG X, LI S F, SUN D Y. Vulnerability analysis of China-Europe container sea-rail intermodal transport network[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(3): 48-58. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.03.006
    [10]
    孙雷, 谢洪平, 余越中, 等. 基于韧性的工程施工安全管控影响因素[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2020, 37(4): 60-65.

    SUN L, XIE H P, YU Y Z, et al. Influencing factors of engineering construction safety control based on resilience[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2020, 37(4): 60-65. (in Chinese)
    [11]
    陈志坚, 王颖林, 赖镕基. 基于韧性理念下的地铁工程施工安全风险管理[J]. 施工技术, 2023, 52(5): 103-109.

    CHEN Z J, WANG Y L, LAI R J. Safety risk management of subway engineering construction based on the concept of resilience[J]. Construction Technology, 2023, 52(5): 103-109. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    张蕾, 段晓红, 牛天勇, 等. 基于脆弱性分析的隧道施工安全管理问题研究[[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2017, 17(5): 1863-1868.

    ZHANG L, DUAN X H, NIU T Y, et al. Study on the tunnel construction safety engineering management based on the vulnerability analysis[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2017, 17(5): 1863-1868. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    陈思妤, 李洁, 胡演诚, 等. 面向常发性拥堵的城市局部路网韧性评价与分析[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2022, 40(4): 138-147.

    CHEN S Y, LI J, HU Y C, et al. An evaluation and analysis on the resilience of the urban local road network for recurrent congestions[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2022, 40(4): 138-147. (in Chinese)
    [14]
    刘夕飞, 司锋超. 高速公路现场施工安全管理现状与对策分析[J]. 大众标准化, 2023, (15): 94-96.

    LI X F, SI F C. Analysis of the current situation and countermeasures of construction safety management on highway site[J]. Popular Standardization, 2023, (15): 94-96. (in Chinese)
    [15]
    包艺翔. 公路隧道施工安全韧性评价及提升策略研究[D]. 北京: 北京建筑大学, 2023.

    BAO Y X. Study on safety resilience evaluation and promotion strategy of highway tunnel construction[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2023. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    樊禹江, 黄欢欢, 丁佳雄, 等. 基于云模型的老旧小区韧性评价体系[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(5): 1-9, 19.

    FAN Y J, HUANG H H, DING J X, et al. Resilience evaluation system of old communities based on cloud model[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2023, 53(5): 1-9, 19. (in Chinese)
    [17]
    PENALOZA G A, SAURIN T A, FORMOSO C T, et al. A resilience engineering perspective of safety performance measurement systems: a systematic literature review[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 130: 104864.
    [18]
    CHEN X L, YU L X, LIN W D, et al. Urban resilience assessment from the multidimensional perspective using dynamic Bayesian network: a case study of Fujian province, China[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 238: 109469.
    [19]
    CAO F F, XU X F, ZHANG C L, et al. Evaluation of urban flood resilience and its space-time evolution: a case study of Zhejiang province, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 154: 110643.
    [20]
    郭延永, 刘攀, 吴瑶, 等. 基于属性识别的高速公路交通安全设施系统评价[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 43(6): 1305-1311.

    GUO Y Y, LIU P, WU Y, et al. Systematic evaluation of highway traffic safety facilities based on attribute identification[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2013, 43(6): 1305-1311. (in Chinese)
    [21]
    MORENO-SADER K, JAIN P, TENORIO L C B, et al. Integrated approach of safety, sustainability, reliability, and resilience analysis via a return on investment metric[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7 (24) : 19522-19536.
    [22]
    于富才, 闫逸晨, 李聆宇, 等. 北京市地质灾害韧性水平评估[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 59(2): 306-312.

    YU F C, YAN Y C, LI L Y, et al. Assessment of the resilience level of geological hazards in Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science), 2023, 59(2): 306-312. (in Chinese)
    [23]
    刘玒玒. 基于熵权TOPSIS-耦合协调度-灰色关联度的长江经济带水资源承载力综合评价[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2023, 56(5): 532-541.

    LIU H H. Comprehensive evaluation of water resources carrying capacity in the Yangtze river economic belt based on entropy weight TOPSIS-coupling coordination degree-grey correlation degree[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2023, 56(5): 532-541. (in Chinese)
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(7)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (111) PDF downloads(8) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright Editorial Office of Transport Information and Safety鄂ICP备05003336号-2

    Address：No. 1178，Heping Avenue, Wuchang, Wuhan, CHINA (430063)

    Tel：027-86580355 Email：jtjsj@vip.163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return