Volume 40 Issue 2
Apr.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WENG Jianjun, LIU Guanjiang. A Site Evaluation of Water Aerodrome Based on Combined Weighting and a Cloud Model[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2022, 40(2): 126-134. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2022.02.015
Citation: WENG Jianjun, LIU Guanjiang. A Site Evaluation of Water Aerodrome Based on Combined Weighting and a Cloud Model[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2022, 40(2): 126-134. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2022.02.015

A Site Evaluation of Water Aerodrome Based on Combined Weighting and a Cloud Model

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2022.02.015
  • Received Date: 2022-01-13
    Available Online: 2022-05-18
  • When a water aerodrome and a navigation channel coexist on a same water surface, seaplanes and ships may encounter each other, which may influence the takeoff, landing, and taxiing of seaplanes, and the navigation safety of vessels in nearby waters. To ensure the safety of seaplanes and vessels, it is extremely important to evaluate the rationality and the safety of water aerodrome site. A method for site evaluation of water aerodrome based on a combined weighting method and a cloud model is proposed. An evaluation system is developed in order to appropriately evaluate the appropriateness of the site of water aerodrome, which include four first-level and 11 second-level indicators from the following aspects: meteorological, hydrological, navigable, and airspace environment. An improved analytic hierarchy process and an entropy weight method are used to obtain the subjective and objective weights of the evaluation indicators, respectively. Then, a gaming model is used to determine the optimal linear combination coefficients of these subjective and objective weights by minimizing the deviation, in order to find the combined weights. A synthetic evaluation model based on combined weighting and a cloud model is developed. Taking Dalu water aerodrome in the City of Zhenjiang as a case study, study results show that the evaluation result of the site of water aerodrome is good. There hasn't been no accident since the water aerodrome is under operation. The evaluation result is consistent with observed safety condition of the airport. The cloud model used can well address the uncertainty in the selection of the membership function by balancing the randomness and fuzziness of data in the evaluation process of any evaluation method using fuzzy mathematics, which further increases the reliability of the evaluation results from the proposed method. Study results show that the evaluation outcomes from the proposed method are similar to those from the classical fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, which verifies the validity as well as the practicability of the model. The proposed model can be applied for the site selection of the water aerodromes to be built, and also for the evaluation of the safety of existing water aerodromes.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    中国民用航空局机场司. 水上机场技术要求(试行): AC-158-CA-2017-01[S/OL]. 北京, 2017.

    Civil Aviation Administration of China. Technical requirements for water aerodrome: AC-158-CA-2017-01[S/OL]. Beijing, 2017. http://www.ccaonline.cn/zhengfu/xg-zhenggu/386041.html. (in Chinese)
    [2]
    DING D L, CAI L C, WANG X L, et al. Application of com-prehensive evaluation of the airport site selection[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2011, 97-98: 311-315. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.97-98.311
    [3]
    QIAO L, ZHANG L. Evaluation of general airport site selection based on synthetic weighting method and grey fuzzy theory[C]. The 2018 International Conference on Sports, Arts, Education and Management Engineering, Taiyuan: Guangzhou Civil Aviation College, 2018.
    [4]
    卢厚清, 刘诚, 杨海明, 等. 基于PCA的机场选址问题综合评价模型[J]. 交通工程, 2012(5): 50-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTBH201205019.htm

    LU H Q, LIU C, YANG H M, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on airport location based on PCA[J]. Traffic Engineering, 2012(5): 50-52. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTBH201205019.htm
    [5]
    WANG Z H, CAI L C, CHONG X L, et al. Airport site selection based on uncertain multi-attribute decision making[C]. 8th International Conference of Chinese Logistics & Transportation Professionals, Baoding: China Communications and Transport Association, 2009.
    [6]
    刘照博. 民用机场选址评价与优化研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2015.

    LIU Z B. Research on the evaluation optimization site selection of civil airport[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2015. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    张世迪, 种小雷, 耿昊, 等. 基于组合赋权与云模型的机场选址方案评价[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2018, 36(5): 34-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5590.2018.05.007

    ZHANG S D, CHONG X L, GENG H, et al. Airport site selection scheme evaluation based on combination weighting and cloud model[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2018, 36(5): 34-37. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5590.2018.05.007
    [8]
    翁建军, 秦亚非, 袁丹, 等. 基于三维动态领域的水上飞机与船舶碰撞危险度研究[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2020, 38(3): 1-7+31. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2020.03.0011

    WENG J J, QIN Y F, YUAN D, et al, Study on the collision risk index between seaplane and ship based on three-dimen-sional dynamic domain[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2020, 38(3): 1-7+31. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2020.03.0011
    [9]
    冯汉卿, 郝航程. 海口市水上机场规划[J]. 交通与运输, 2020, 36(1): 46-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3400.2020.01.015

    FENG H Q, HAO H C. Planning of water aerodrome in Haikou[J]. Traffic and Transportation, 2020, 36(1): 46-50. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3400.2020.01.015
    [10]
    陈俊锋. 基于AHP-TOPSIS的水上机场选址研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2018.

    CHEN J F. Research on the site selection of water aerodrome based on AHP and TOPSIS[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2018. (in Chinese)
    [11]
    陈俊锋, 翁建军, 吴兵, 等. 基于熵权-TOPSIS的水上机场选址研究[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2018, 36(2): 112-119. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2018.02.016

    CHEN J F, WENG J J, WU B, et al, Afacility location model based on entropy and TOPSIS for sea drones[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2018, 36(2): 112-119. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2018.02.016
    [12]
    任银龙, 鲍学英. 基于博弈论-云模型的铁路绿色施工环境影响综合评价[J] IOL. 公路工程: 1-14. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/43.1481.U.20210408.1153.028.html.

    REN Y L, BAO X Y. Comprehensive evaluation of environmental impact of railway green construction based on game theory-cloud model[J]. Highway Engineering, 1-14. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    舒孝珍. 一种改进的层次分析法在出行方式选择中的应用[J]. 绵阳师范学院学报, 2021, 40(2): 6-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MYSF202102002.htm

    SHU X Z. Application of improved AHP in travel mode selection[J]. Journal of Mianyang Teschers'College, 2021, 40(2): 6-9. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MYSF202102002.htm
    [14]
    李刚, 李建平, 孙晓蕾, 等[J]. 主客观权重的组合方式及其合理性研究[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(12): 17-26+61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWGD201712003.htm

    LI G, LI J P, SUN X L, et al. Study on the combination of subjective and objective weight and its rationality[J]. Management Review, 2017, 29(12): 17-26+61. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWGD201712003.htm
    [15]
    徐建闽, 韦佳, 首艳芳. 基于博弈论-云模型的城市道路交通运行状态综合评价[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 38(4): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXSF202004001.htm

    XU J M, WEI J, SHOU Y F. Comprehensive evaluation of ur-ban road traffic operation Status based on game theory-cloud model[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 38(4): 1-10. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXSF202004001.htm
    [16]
    盛昀, 方学东, 冯自立. 基于博弈论组合赋权的机场净空障碍物风险性评价[J]. 民航学报, 2020, 4(5): 35-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MHXE202005010.htm

    SHENG Y, FANG X D, FENG Z L. Risk assessment of airport clearance obstacle based on combination weighting of game theory[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation, 2020, 4(5): 35-39. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MHXE202005010.htm
    [17]
    佟馨, 江福才, 郭颜斌, 等. 长江航道航行环境风险评价[J]. 上海海事大学学报, 2017, 38(4): 32-36+42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHHY201704009.htm

    TONG X, JIANG F C, GUO Y B, et al. Navigation environment risk assessment of Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Shang-hai Maritime University, 2017, 38(4): 32-36+42. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHHY201704009.htm
    [18]
    Federal Aviation Administration. Advisory Circular for Seaplane Bases: 150/5395-1A[S/OL]. (2013-08-06)[2022-01-09]. http://www.faa.gov/regulationspoolicies/adviso-rycirculars/index,cfm/go/document.information/documentID/1021815.
    [19]
    EuropeanCommunity-EuropeanRegionalDevelopmentFound. Seaplane sustainable and efficient air transport platform for linked analysis of the north sea transport environment[R/OL]. (2002-11-30)[2022-01-09]. http://seaplaneproject.net/.
    [20]
    ZHUANG W X, GUO G P. Research and countermeasures on lng ship port area navigation risk assessment based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[C]. 8th International Conference on Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Tokyo: Chemietry & Bioengineering, 2021.
    [21]
    钟鸣. 基于关联规则和云模型的水库诱发地震风险多层次模糊综合评价[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2013.

    ZHONG M. Multi-lever fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of reservoir induced seismic risk based on association rules and cloud model[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of science & Technology, 2013.( in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (975) PDF downloads(58) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return