Volume 42 Issue 3
Jun.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YAO Hongyu, JIN Guobo, PAN Keke. An Evaluation Method for Safety Resilience of High Slope Construction Based on Bootstrap-matter-element Extension Model[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(3): 131-138. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.014
Citation: YAO Hongyu, JIN Guobo, PAN Keke. An Evaluation Method for Safety Resilience of High Slope Construction Based on Bootstrap-matter-element Extension Model[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(3): 131-138. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.014

An Evaluation Method for Safety Resilience of High Slope Construction Based on Bootstrap-matter-element Extension Model

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.014
  • Received Date: 2024-01-10
    Available Online: 2024-10-21
  • In order to solve the problems of one-sided index system, fuzzy value range, and weak practicability in traditional high slope construction safety evaluation, a method of safety resilience evaluation of high slope construction based on Bootstrap-matter element extension model is proposed. Combined with the concept of safety resilience, the correlation strength method and keyword cluster analysis are used to screen the safety factors of high slope construction. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test and multicollinearity test are used to deal with index correlation degree and collinearity respectively. The evaluation index system of construction safety resilience of high slope is formed, which takes stability, redundancy, efficiency and fitness as the first index and operator experience and other 20 factors as the second index. The comprehensive matter-element matrix is determined according to matter-element extension principle, and the classical domain is determined by Bootstrap method to deal with the unknown sample distribution hypothesis. Furthermore, the correlation degree function is established and the index correlation degree under each evaluation grade is calculated. The weight of each safety resilience index is determined by entropy weight method, and the construction safety resilience evaluation model of high slope is formed. Based on a highway high slope construction project, the feasibility of the model is verified, and compared with the traditional construction safety risk assessment results, the results show that the safety resilience grade of the high slope is Ⅲ, which is consistent with the risk assessment results of LEC method and expert investigation method. Moreover, the Bootstrap-matter-element extension model provides the overall safety resilience level and traceability analysis results. Compared with the likelihood-exposure-consequence (LEC) method, the mature-element extension model improves the accuracy by 9.68%, the recall rate by 5.51% and the generalization by 12.09%. The construction safety resilience index system of high slope includes construction safety factors in addition to the basic influencing factors such as slope structure, so it has higher practicability.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    孟建丹, 商红标. 浅析高速公路施工安全事故的一般成因及应对措施[J]. 湖南交通科技, 2010, 36(2): 76-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-844X.2010.02.025

    MENG J D, SHANG H B. The analysis of the general causes and countermeasures of highway construction safety accidents[J]. Hunan Communication Science and Technology, 2010, 36(2): 76-78. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-844X.2010.02.025
    [2]
    刘鹏君. 高速公路高边坡稳定性评价及加固措施对比分析[J]. 交通世界, 2024(10): 34-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8872(s).2024.10.012

    LIU P J. Stability evaluation of highway high slope and comparative analysis of strengthening measures[J]. Transpo World, 2024(10): 34-36. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8872(s).2024.10.012
    [3]
    冯文凯, 石豫川, 柴贺军, 等. 缓倾角层状高边坡变形破坏机制物理模拟研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2004, 17(2): 32-36. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2004.02.007

    FENG W K, SHI Y C, CHAI H J, et al. Study of mechanism of deformation failure of a low-angle bedded high slope with physical simulation method[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2004, 17(2): 32-36. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2004.02.007
    [4]
    何忠明, 刘可, 付宏渊, 等. 基于集对可拓粗糙集方法的高边坡爆破施工安全风险评价[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 48(8): 2217- 2223.

    HE Z M, LIU K, FU H Y, et al. Safety risk assessment of high slope blasting construction based on set pair-extension analysis[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2017, 48(8): 2217-2223. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    LIN D, CHEN P, MA J, et al. Assessment of slope construction risk uncertainty based on index importance ranking[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2019, 78: 4217-4228. doi: 10.1007/s10064-018-1387-2
    [6]
    胡惠华, 张嘉睿, 陈昌富, 等. 基于改进CRITIC赋权机器学习算法的边坡稳定性评价与预测模型[J]. 公路工程, 2023, 48(6): 74-83.

    HU H H, ZHANG J R, CHEN C F, et al. Slope stability evaluation and prediction model based on improved CRITIC weighted machine learning algorithm[J]. High Engineering, 2023, 48(6): 74-83. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    杨静, 李尚广, 伍东卫, 等. 考虑降雨影响的高填路基稳定性模糊综合评价研究[J]. 交通科技, 2023, (3): 15-19, 33. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1671-7570.2023.03.004

    YANG J, LI S G, WU D W, et al. A new fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method for stability of high fill subgrade considering the influence of rainfall[J]. Technology Science & Transportation, 2023, (3): 15-19, 33. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1671-7570.2023.03.004
    [8]
    姜波, 周娟. 基于AHP-FCE法的公路路堑高边坡施工安全风险评估[J]. 中国水运(下半月), 2024, 24(6): 113-115.

    JIANG B, ZHOU J. Construction safety risk assessment of highway high slope based on AHP-FCE method[J]. China Water Transport, 2024, 24(6): 113-115. (in Chinese)
    [9]
    HU Q G, XIE W X, HE Z M. Risk evaluation index system for operation security in high slope construction on freeway reconstruction and extension[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 438: 1983-1986.
    [10]
    周洪文, 冯鑫淼, 王宏, 等. 基于物元可拓组合模型的高速公路道路安全风险评价[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 43(4): 37-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2024.04.06

    ZHOU H W, FENG X M, WANG H, et al. Highway road safety risk evaluation based on material-element extensible combination model[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2024, 43(4): 37-44. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2024.04.06
    [11]
    杨兴洪, 王红星, 李德荣, 等. 建设期路堑高边坡地震稳定性评价方法及应用[J]. 公路工程, 2024, 49(2): 69-75.

    YANG X H, WANG H X, LI D R, et al. Evaluation method and application of seismic stability of high cutting slope during construction period[J]. Highway Engineering, 2024, 49(2): 69-75. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    马飞, 赵成勇, 孙启鹏, 等. 重大公共卫生灾害主动限流背景下城市轨道交通网络集成韧性[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2023, 23(1): 208-221.

    MA F, ZHAO C Y, SUN Q P, et al. Integrated resilience of urban rail transit network with active passenger flow restriction under major public health disasters[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(1): 208-221. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    KONTOKOSTA C E, MALIK A. The resilience to emergencies and disasters index: applying big data to benchmark and validate neighborhood resilience capacity[J]. Sustainable Cities & Society, 2018, 36: 272-285.
    [14]
    曲明辉. 基于熵权和物元可拓法的航运高质量发展评价研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2023.

    QU M H. Research on the evaluation of high-quality development of shipping based on entropy weight and matter-element extension method[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2023. (in Chinese)
    [15]
    ZHAO X, ZHANG C, JU Y, et al. Evaluation of tunnel retro-reflective arch in an extra-long tunnel based on the matter-element extension method[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 150: 105913.
    [16]
    刘怡帆. 突发公共卫生事件下城市应急能力韧性评价——以2021年底西安市新冠疫情为例[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2023.

    LIU Y F. Evaluation of urban emergency response capacity resilience under public health emergencies: a case study of the new crown epidemic in Xi'an at the end of 2021[D]. Xi'an: Changan University, 2023. (in Chinese)
    [17]
    MATTSSON L G, JENELIUS E. Vulnerability and resil-ience of transport systems-A discussion of recent research[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 81: 16-34. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002
    [18]
    JACKSON S. A multidisciplinary framework for resilience to disasters and disruptions[J]. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 2007, 11(2): 91-108.
    [19]
    严修, 鲁誉, 谢谦, 等. 基于Bootstrap-DEA-Gini模型的公交线路运行效率评价方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41(1): 161-168. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.01.017

    YAN X, LU Y, XIE Q, et al. A method for evaluating operation efficiency of bus lines based on a Bootstrap-DEA-Gini model[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(1): 161-168. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.01.017
    [20]
    POURKHOSRAVANI A, KALANTARI B. A review of current methods for slope stability evaluation[J]. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 16: 1245-1254.
    [21]
    SU H, YANG M, WEN Z. An approach using multi-factor combination to evaluate high rocky slope safety[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2016, 16 (6): 1449-1463. doi: 10.5194/nhess-16-1449-2016
    [22]
    CHA K S, KIM T H. Evaluation of slope stability with topography and slope stability analysis method[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2011, 15(2): 251-256. doi: 10.1007/s12205-011-0930-5
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (117) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return