Volume 42 Issue 4
Aug.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Yongjie, XU Yueying, SU Qian, LI Qiong, YOU Xinshang. A Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Lane-based Risk for Urban Intersections Based on Bayesian Inference and XGBoost[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(4): 12-20. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.002
Citation: WANG Yongjie, XU Yueying, SU Qian, LI Qiong, YOU Xinshang. A Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Lane-based Risk for Urban Intersections Based on Bayesian Inference and XGBoost[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(4): 12-20. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.002

A Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Lane-based Risk for Urban Intersections Based on Bayesian Inference and XGBoost

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.002
  • Received Date: 2023-08-26
    Available Online: 2024-11-25
  • This study addresses the challenges of inadequate researches on lane-scale risk evaluation and the uncertainties in complex interactions at urban signal-controlled intersections. To this end, a comprehensive risk evaluation model is developed based on Bayesian inference and XGBoost. Specifically, this study is based on traffic video data from three intersections in Xi'an: Jixiang Village, Mingguang Road, and Qingsong Road. Two innovative risk-evaluation sets are constructed from the dimensions of temporal and spatial proximities, in which key indicators, including post-entrainment time, maximum speed, distance difference and speed difference are selected to capture dynamic risk characteristics of intersections. Further, Bayesian inference is used to develop a probabilistic evaluation method to address uncertainties in complex interactions at intersections. Next, SHAP value theory of the XGBoost model and Logistic regression are applied to analyze the significance and importance of factors influencing lane risk levels. The results show that: ①The proposed model outperforms baseline models in identifying medium and high-risk interactions. It also more accurately assesses extreme danger interactions, avoiding the overestimation observed in baseline models. ②Among the typical interactions, that between motor vehicle-bicycle, pedestrian-motor vehicle, and pedestrian-bicycle, only a small portion are classified as extreme risk, though medium-risk interactions account for 29.7%, 20.8%, and 34.3%, respectively. ③There are significant differences regarding the risk level across different lanes, with the first lane being more prone to traffic conflicts compared to the second, third, and fourth lanes. ④For all three interaction types, lane risk is mainly influenced by speed, acceleration, and traffic volume. In motor vehicle-bicycle interactions, the highest risk occurs in the first lane and on roads with narrow buffer zones, particularly during morning rush hours and on right-turn lanes. Pedestrian-motor vehicle interactions are primarily influenced by speed and traffic volume, with higher risks in the first lane. For pedestrian-bicycle interactions, narrower bicycle lanes increase the risk of conflicts.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    CHEN W Q, WANG T, WANG Y J, et al. Lane-based distance-velocity model for evaluating pedestrian-vehicle interaction at non-signalized locations[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2022, 176: 106810.
    [2]
    MA Z J, MEI G, CUOMO S. An analytic framework using deep learning for prediction of traffic accident injury severity based on contributing factors[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 160: 106322.
    [3]
    王春勤, 牟瑞芳, 阮黄山. 基于灰云模型的城市道路交叉口交通冲突严重性研究[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2019, 17(3): 162-169.

    VUONG X C, MOU R F, NGUYEN H S. Study on traffic conflict severity of urban intersections based on grey cloud model[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2019, 17(3): 162-169. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    WANG T, GE Y E, WANG Y J, et al. A novel model for real-time risk evaluation of vehicle-pedestrian interactions at intersections[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2024, 206: 107727.
    [5]
    李杰, 曾叙砜, 孙领, 等. 全国道路安全水平的时空布局演化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 136-143.

    LI J, ZENG X F, SUN L, et al. Research on temporal and spatial evolution of road safety in China[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(12): 136-143. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    MOKHTARIMOUSAVI S, ANDERSON J C, AZIZINAMINI A, et al. Factors affecting injury severity in vehicle-pedestrian crashes: a day-of-week analysis using random parameter ordered response models and artificial neural networks[J]. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 2020, 9(2): 100-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtst.2020.01.001
    [7]
    石琦, 方勇, 胡华, 等. 平面信号控制交叉口有轨电车与机动车交通冲突风险评价模型[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(增刊1): 147-151.

    SHI Q, FANG Y, HU H, et al. Risk assessment model of traffic conflict between tram and vehicle at signalized intersections[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2020, 16(S1): 147-151. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    ALMODFER R, XIONG S W, FANG Z X, et. al. Quantitative analysis of lane-based pedestrian-vehicle conflict at a non-signalized marked crosswalk[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2016, 42(3): 468-478.
    [9]
    郭延永, 刘攀, 吴瑶, 等. 基于冲突模型的非常规信号交叉口安全评价[J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(1): 85-92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2022.01.008

    GUO Y Y, LIU P, WU Y, et al. Safety evaluation of unconventional signalized intersection based on traffic conflict extreme model[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(1): 85-92. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2022.01.008
    [10]
    JIANG C Z, QIU R, FU T, et al. Impact of right-turn channelization on pedestrian safety at signalized intersections[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2020, 136: 105399.
    [11]
    朱顺应, 蒋若曦, 王红, 等. 机动车交通冲突技术研究综述[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(2): 15-33.

    ZHU S Y, JIANG R X, WANG H, et al. Review of research on traffic conflict techniques[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33(2): 15-33. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    GOVINDA L, RAJU M S K, SHANKAR K R. Pedestrian-vehicle interaction severity level assessment at uncontrolled intersections using machine learning algorithms[J]. Safety Science, 2022, 153: 105806. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105806
    [13]
    OLSZEWSKI P, DABKOWSKI P, SZAGALA P, et al. Surrogate safety indicator for unsignalised pedestrian crossings[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2020, 70: 25-36. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.02.011
    [14]
    葛慧敏, 周礼军, 薄云钰, 等. 基于交通冲突理论的道路安全评价技术研究综述[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2022, 40(6): 12-21. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2022.06.002

    GE H M, ZHOU L J, BO Y Y, et al. A review of road safety evaluation techniques based on traffic conflict theories[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2022, 40(6): 12-21. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2022.06.002
    [15]
    吕能超, 王玉刚, 周颖, 等. 道路交通安全分析与评价方法综述[J]. 中国公路学报, 2023, 36(4): 183-201. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2023.04.016

    LYU N C, WANG Y G, ZHOU Y, et al. Review of road traffic safety analysis and evaluation methods[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2023, 36(4): 183-201. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2023.04.016
    [16]
    褚昭明, 陈瑞祥, 刘金广. 城市道路无信号控制路段行人过街风险分级预警模型[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41(1): 53-61. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.01.006

    CHU Z M, CHEN R X, LIU J G. A model of risk classification and forewarning for pedestrian crossing behavior at unsignalized urban roadways[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(1): 53-61. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.01.006
    [17]
    陆毅忱, 邹亚杰, 程凯, 等. 基于风险域的城市道路交叉口交通冲突分析方法[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(7): 941-948.

    LU Y C, ZOU Y J, CHENG K, et al. Analytical method of traffic conflict at urban road intersections based on risk region[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2021, 49(7): 941-948. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    HU J C, LI X, CEN Y Q, et al. A roadside decision-making methodology based on deep reinforcement learning to simultaneously improve the safety and efficiency of merging zone[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(10): 18620-18631. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3157910
    [19]
    胡立伟, 薛宇, 赵雪亭, 等. 驾驶人不同驾龄条件下公路交通风险致因耦合影响研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2023, 30(2): 1-9.

    HU L W, XUE Y, ZHAO X T, et al. Study on the coupling effect of road traffic risk causes under different driving ages[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2023, 30(2): 1-9. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    XU C, ZHAO W., WANG C. An integrated threat assessment algorithm for decision-making of autonomous driving vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2020, 21(6): 1-12. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.2995537
    [21]
    NOH S. Decision-making framework for autonomous driving at road intersections: safeguarding against collision, overly conservative behavior, and violation vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2018, 66(4): 3275-3286.
    [22]
    郭延永, 刘攀, 吴瑶, 等. 基于贝叶斯多元泊松-对数正态分布的交通冲突模型[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(1): 101-109.

    GUO Y Y, LIU P, WU Y, et al. Traffic conflict model based on bayesian multivariate poisson-lognormal normal distribution[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31 (1): 101-109. (in Chinese)
    [23]
    ZHANG C B, ZHOU B, CHEN G J, et al. Quantitative analysis of pedestrian safety at uncontrolled multi-lane mid-block crosswalks in China[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2017, 108: 19-26.
    [24]
    AMINI R E, YANG K, ANTONIOU C. Development of a conflict risk evaluation model to assess pedestrian safety in interaction with vehicles[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2022, 175: 106773.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (91) PDF downloads(22) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return